Comments on: Lean MTP… (part 2) http://www.testingthefuture.net/2010/02/make-it-fast-write-a-mastertestplan%e2%80%a6-part-2/ Tue, 07 Feb 2012 14:16:44 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1 By: Ewald http://www.testingthefuture.net/2010/02/make-it-fast-write-a-mastertestplan%e2%80%a6-part-2/comment-page-1/#comment-760 Ewald Wed, 24 Feb 2010 08:22:41 +0000 http://www.testingthefuture.net/?p=1018#comment-760 Ed, You're correct. That step is taken with "Then I sorted the results into the different processes and object parts of the product (they were stated in the documentation)." There I combine the process and object parts. Thanks. -Ewald Ed,

You’re correct. That step is taken with “Then I sorted the results into the different processes and object parts of the product (they were stated in the documentation).” There I combine the process and object parts.

Thanks.

-Ewald

]]> By: Ed H http://www.testingthefuture.net/2010/02/make-it-fast-write-a-mastertestplan%e2%80%a6-part-2/comment-page-1/#comment-759 Ed H Tue, 23 Feb 2010 15:51:15 +0000 http://www.testingthefuture.net/?p=1018#comment-759 Question: In the last schema you combined object parts with processes to determine the risk class. It looks like a step is missing, namely which process uses which object part. Or did I miss something? Ed Question: In the last schema you combined object parts with processes to determine the risk class. It looks like a step is missing, namely which process uses which object part. Or did I miss something?

Ed

]]>